Erratum: "Determining neutron star masses and radii using energy-resolved waveforms of X-ray burst oscillations" (ApJ, 776, 19 [2013])
Ka Ho Lo, M. Coleman Miller, Sudip Bhattacharyya, Frederick K. Lamb

TL;DR
This paper corrects a computational error in previous studies of neutron star waveform modeling caused by an incorrect expression for the differential emitting area, significantly impacting the accuracy of prior results.
Contribution
It provides a correction to the relativistic computations of neutron star pulse waveforms, clarifying the impact of the previous error on earlier findings.
Findings
Previous waveform models had systematic errors due to incorrect area calculations.
Corrected computations alter the inferred neutron star masses and radii.
Systematic errors from spectral assumptions likely exceeded those from the area calculation mistake.
Abstract
This erratum addresses an error in the text of Lo et al. (2013) and more importantly corrects a computational error that was made in all previously published relativistic computations of absolute pulse waveform fluxes produced by hot spots on rotating stars that followed the radiation forward in time from the star to the observer. These computations used an incorrect expression for the differential emitting area on the stellar surface, as measured in the comoving frame. This erratum explains this error, lists all the published papers that contain results affected by this error, and summarizes in a general way why and how the results in Lo et al. (2013) were affected by this error, in a way that makes clear why and how the results in the other papers were affected. The idealized radiation spectra, beaming patterns, and spot shapes assumed in many of the previously reported computations…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
