Differential cross section and photon-beam asymmetry for the gamma p -> pi- Delta++(1232) reaction at forward pi- angles for Egamma=1.5-2.95 GeV
H. Kohri, S.H. Shiu, W.C. Chang, Y. Yanai, D.S. Ahn, J.K. Ahn, J.Y., Chen, S. Date, H. Ejiri, H. Fujimura, M. Fujiwara, S. Fukui, W. Gohn, K., Hicks, A. Hosaka, T. Hotta, S.H. Hwang, K. Imai, T. Ishikawa, K. Joo, Y., Kato, Y. Kon, H.S. Lee, Y. Maeda, T. Mibe, M. Miyabe

TL;DR
This study provides the first high-statistics measurements of differential cross sections and photon-beam asymmetries for the gamma p -> pi- Delta++(1232) reaction at forward angles and energies 1.5-2.95 GeV, revealing insights into production mechanisms and exchange processes.
Contribution
It presents the first high-statistics data on cross sections and asymmetries for this reaction in the specified kinematic region, highlighting the dominance of pi-exchange and the need for advanced models.
Findings
Negative asymmetries suggest pi-exchange dominance.
No distinct peak in cross sections but excess over theory at 1.5-1.8 GeV.
Asymmetries differ from reactions producing other quark pairs.
Abstract
Differential cross sections and photon-beam asymmetries for the gamma p -> pi- Delta++(1232) reaction have been measured for 0.7<cos(theta)<1 and Egamma=1.5-2.95 GeV at SPring-8/LEPS. The first-ever high statistics cross section data are obtained in this kinematical region, and the asymmetry data for 1.5<Egamma(GeV)<2.8 are obtained for the first time. This reaction has a unique feature for studying the production mechanisms of a pure quark pair in the final state from the proton. Although there is no distinct peak structure in the cross sections, a non-negligible excess over the theoretical predictions is observed at Egamma=1.5-1.8 GeV. The asymmetries are found to be negative in most of the present kinematical regions, suggesting the dominance of pi-exchange in the t-channel. The negative asymmetries at forward meson production angles are different from the asymmetries…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
