Sensitivity of codispersion to noise and error in ecological and environmental data
Ronny Vallejos, Hannah L Buckley, Bradley S Case, Jonathan, Acosta, Aaron M Ellison

TL;DR
This study evaluates how noise and measurement errors affect the reliability of codispersion analysis in ecological and environmental data, using simulations and real datasets to identify robustness thresholds and improve interpretation.
Contribution
It provides the first empirical assessment of codispersion's sensitivity to data contamination, offering practical guidelines and a method for imputing missing spatial data.
Findings
Codispersion estimates are robust with less than 15% contamination.
Sensitivity increases significantly with higher contamination levels.
A new method for imputing missing spatial data enhances analysis robustness.
Abstract
Codispersion analysis is a new statistical method developed to assess spatial covariation between two spatial processes that may not be isotropic or stationary. Its application to anisotropic ecological datasets have provided new insights into mechanisms underlying observed patterns of species distributions and the relationship between individual species and underlying environmental gradients. However, the performance of the codispersion coefficient when there is noise or measurement error ("contamination") in the data has been addressed only theoretically. Here, we use Monte Carlo simulations and real datasets to investigate the sensitivity of codispersion to four types of contamination commonly seen in many real-world environmental and ecological studies. Three of these involved examining codispersion of a spatial dataset with a contaminated version of itself. The fourth examined…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
