The Shape of Art History in the Eyes of the Machine
Ahmed Elgammal, Marian Mazzone, Bingchen Liu, Diana Kim and, Mohamed Elhoseiny

TL;DR
This study investigates how convolutional neural networks classify art styles, revealing that they organize artworks temporally and identify key stylistic factors, some aligning with art historical concepts and artists.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of CNN representations in art style classification, linking learned features to art history concepts and confirming stylistic distinctions quantitatively.
Findings
Networks organize artworks in a smooth temporal sequence without explicit temporal data.
Few underlying factors explain visual style variations, some correlating with Wölfflin's concepts.
Certain artists are identified as distinctive representatives of their styles.
Abstract
How does the machine classify styles in art? And how does it relate to art historians' methods for analyzing style? Several studies have shown the ability of the machine to learn and predict style categories, such as Renaissance, Baroque, Impressionism, etc., from images of paintings. This implies that the machine can learn an internal representation encoding discriminative features through its visual analysis. However, such a representation is not necessarily interpretable. We conducted a comprehensive study of several of the state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks applied to the task of style classification on 77K images of paintings, and analyzed the learned representation through correlation analysis with concepts derived from art history. Surprisingly, the networks could place the works of art in a smooth temporal arrangement mainly based on learning style labels, without…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
