The SCUBA-2 Cosmology Legacy Survey: The EGS deep field - II. Morphological transformation and multi-wavelength properties of faint submillimetre galaxies
J. A. Zavala, I. Aretxaga, J. S. Dunlop, M. J. Micha{\l}owski, D. H., Hughes, N. Bourne, E. Chapin, W. Cowley, D. Farrah, C. Lacey, T. Targett, P., van der Werf

TL;DR
This study analyzes faint submillimetre galaxies in the EGS field, revealing their redshift distribution, physical properties, and morphological evolution, supporting their role as progenitors of massive elliptical galaxies.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed multi-wavelength and morphological analysis of faint SMGs in the EGS, linking their properties to galaxy evolution models.
Findings
Most sources are high-mass star-forming galaxies on the main sequence.
Morphological transition from irregular disks to spheroid-dominated structures at z~1.4.
Most galaxies are disk-like with sizes around 4.8 kpc.
Abstract
We present a multi-wavelength analysis of galaxies selected at 450 and 850um from the deepest SCUBA-2 observations in the Extended Groth Strip (EGS) field, which have an average depth of sigma_450=1.9 and sigma_850=0.46 mJy/beam over ~70 sq. arcmin. The final sample comprises 95 sources: 56 (59%) are detected at both wavelengths, 31 (33%) are detected only at 850um, and 8 (8%) are detected only at 450um. We identify counterparts for 75% of the whole sample. The redshift distributions of the 450 and 850um samples peak at different redshifts with median values of z=1.66 +/- 0.18 and z=2.30 +/- 0.20, respectively. However, the two populations have similar IR luminosities, SFRs, and stellar masses, with mean values of (1.5 +/- 0.2) x 10^12 L_sun, (150 +/- 20) M_sun/yr, and (9.0 +/- 0.6) x 10^10 M_sun, respectively. This places most of our sources (>85%) on the high-mass end of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
