Similarity solution for the flow behind a magnetogasdynamic exponential shock wave in a perfect gas with varying density, heat conduction and radiation heat flux
Ruchi Bajargaan, Arvind Patel, Manoj Singh

TL;DR
This paper derives similarity solutions for the propagation of an exponential shock wave in a magnetized perfect gas with variable density, heat conduction, and radiation, analyzing how magnetic and thermal parameters influence shock behavior.
Contribution
It presents new similarity solutions considering magnetic fields, heat conduction, and radiation effects with variable density and temperature-dependent properties, extending previous shock wave models.
Findings
Shock strength decreases with increasing magnetic field strength.
Shock wave properties are unaffected by heat transfer parameters.
Total flow energy varies as a power of shock radius.
Abstract
Similarity solutions are obtained for one dimensional, unsteady, adiabatic propagation of an exponential shock wave in a perfect gas with heat conduction and radiation heat flux, in the presence of azimuthal magnetic field. The shock wave is driven out by a piston moving with time according to an exponential law. The equilibrium flow conditions are maintained. The heat conduction is expressed in terms of Fourier's law and the radiation is considered to be of the diffusion type for an optically thick grey gas model. The thermal conductivity and the absorption coefficient are assumed to vary with temperature and density according to power law. The density and magnetic field ahead of the shock front, are assumed to vary as an exponential law. The effects of the variation of the strength of ambient magnetic field, heat transfer parameters, adiabatic exponent, ambient density variation index…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
