Guidelines for Systematic Mapping Studies in Security Engineering
Michael Felderer, Jeffrey C. Carver

TL;DR
This paper provides methodological guidance for conducting systematic mapping studies in security engineering, helping researchers classify and analyze research topics to identify well-studied areas and gaps.
Contribution
It offers a tailored process and practical examples for performing systematic mapping studies specifically in security engineering.
Findings
Provides a detailed process for systematic mapping in security engineering
Uses published mapping studies to illustrate the methodology
Aims to increase awareness and encourage more mapping studies in the field
Abstract
Security engineering in the software lifecycle aims at protecting information and systems to guarantee confidentiality, integrity, and availability. As security engineering matures and the number of research papers grows, there is an increasing need for papers that summarize results and provide an overview of the area. A systematic mapping study "maps" a research area by classifying papers to identify which topics are well-studied and which need additional study. Therefore, systematic mapping studies are becoming increasingly important in security engineering. This chapter provides methodological support for systematic mapping studies in security engineering based on examples from published security engineering papers. Because security engineering is similar to software engineering in that it bridges research and practice, researchers can use the same basic systematic mapping process,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInformation and Cyber Security · Software Engineering Research · Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
