TL;DR
This paper systematically analyzes the architectural strengths and weaknesses of eight fully convolutional neural networks for brain tissue segmentation in MRI, comparing 2D and 3D approaches, modalities, and sampling strategies across multiple datasets.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive evaluation framework for FCNN architectures in brain MRI segmentation, including implementation, comparison, and public availability of the testing setup.
Findings
2D and 3D approaches have distinct advantages and limitations.
Multi-modality data improves segmentation accuracy.
Overlapping sampling enhances model training and testing.
Abstract
Accurate brain tissue segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has attracted the attention of medical doctors and researchers since variations in tissue volume help in diagnosing and monitoring neurological diseases. Several proposals have been designed throughout the years comprising conventional machine learning strategies as well as convolutional neural networks (CNN) approaches. In particular, in this paper, we analyse a sub-group of deep learning methods producing dense predictions. This branch, referred in the literature as Fully CNN (FCNN), is of interest as these architectures can process an input volume in less time than CNNs and local spatial dependencies may be encoded since several voxels are classified at once. Our study focuses on understanding architectural strengths and weaknesses of literature-like approaches. Hence, we implement eight FCNN architectures…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
