Evidence of an Upper Bound on the Masses of Planets and its Implications for Giant Planet Formation
Kevin C. Schlaufman

TL;DR
This paper suggests an upper mass limit of around 10 Jupiter masses for planets formed via core accretion, implying more massive objects likely form through gravitational instability, impacting our understanding of giant planet formation.
Contribution
It identifies a mass threshold distinguishing core accretion from gravitational instability in planet formation, challenging existing models predicting larger maximum masses.
Findings
Objects <~4 M_Jup orbit metal-rich stars, indicating core accretion.
Objects >~10 M_Jup do not share this property, suggesting a different formation process.
Maximum mass for core accretion planets is less than 10 M_Jup.
Abstract
Celestial bodies with a mass of M ~ 10 M_Jup have been found orbiting nearby stars. It is unknown whether these objects formed like gas-giant planets through core accretion or like stars through gravitational instability. I show that objects with M <~ 4 M_Jup orbit metal-rich solar-type dwarf stars, a property associated with core accretion. Objects with M >~ 10 M_Jup do not share this property. This transition is coincident with a minimum in the occurrence rate of such objects, suggesting that the maximum mass of a celestial body formed through core accretion like a planet is less than 10 M_Jup. Consequently, objects with M >~ 10 M_Jup orbiting solar-type dwarf stars likely formed through gravitational instability and should not be thought of as planets. Theoretical models of giant planet formation in scaled minimum-mass solar nebula Shakura--Sunyaev disks with standard parameters…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
