(Information) Paradox Regained? A Brief Comment on Maudlin on Black Hole Information Loss
JB Manchak, James Owen Weatherall

TL;DR
This paper examines the black hole information loss paradox, arguing that a genuine paradox exists contrary to Maudlin's claims, and discusses its significance and responses.
Contribution
It challenges Maudlin's view by asserting the persistence of the paradox and analyzes its implications in the context of black hole physics.
Findings
Confirmation of the paradox's existence
Analysis of Maudlin's response to the paradox
Implications for black hole information theory
Abstract
We discuss some recent work by Tim Maudlin concerning Black Hole Information Loss. We argue, contra Maudlin, that there is a paradox, in the straightforward sense that there are propositions that appear true, but which are incompatible with one another. We discuss the significance of the paradox and Maudlin's response to it.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
