Descendants of the first stars: the distinct chemical signature of second generation stars
Tilman Hartwig, Naoki Yoshida, Mattis Magg, Anna Frebel, Simon C. O., Glover, Facundo A. G\'omez, Brendan Griffen, Miho N. Ishigaki, Alexander P., Ji, Ralf S. Klessen, Brian W. O'Shea, Nozomu Tominaga

TL;DR
This paper develops a new method to identify mono-enriched extremely metal-poor stars, enabling better inference of the properties of the first supernovae and their progenitors in the Milky Way.
Contribution
It introduces a novel analytical diagnostic for identifying mono-enriched stars based on supernova yields, applicable independently of Pop III star formation assumptions.
Findings
Mono-enriched stars are about 1% of second generation stars in the model.
The diagnostic effectively distinguishes mono-enriched stars in observed samples.
Provides selection criteria for future surveys of EMP stars.
Abstract
Extremely metal-poor (EMP) stars in the Milky Way (MW) allow us to infer the properties of their progenitors by comparing their chemical composition to the metal yields of the first supernovae. This method is most powerful when applied to mono-enriched stars, i.e. stars that formed from gas that was enriched by only one previous supernova. We present a novel diagnostic to identify this subclass of EMP stars. We model the first generations of star formation semi-analytically, based on dark matter halo merger trees that yield MW-like halos at the present day. Radiative and chemical feedback are included self-consistently and we trace all elements up to zinc. Mono-enriched stars account for only of second generation stars in our fiducial model and we provide an analytical formula for this probability. We also present a novel analytical diagnostic to identify mono-enriched stars,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
