Neutrino masses and their ordering: Global Data, Priors and Models
S. Gariazzo, M. Archidiacono, P.F. de Salas, O. Mena, C.A. Ternes, and, M. T\'ortola

TL;DR
This paper uses Bayesian methods to analyze current neutrino data, assessing the evidence for normal versus inverted mass ordering, and emphasizes the importance of priors and parametrizations in such analyses.
Contribution
It systematically compares different parametrizations and priors in Bayesian neutrino mass analyses, identifying the most effective strategies for future research.
Findings
Preference for Normal Ordering is data-driven but weak under most priors
Logarithmic priors and specific parametrizations yield stronger evidence for NO
Limits on total neutrino mass vary significantly with prior choices
Abstract
We present a Bayesian analysis of the combination of current neutrino oscillation, neutrinoless double beta decay and CMB observations. Our major goal is to carefully investigate the possibility to single out one neutrino mass ordering, Normal Ordering or Inverted Ordering, with current data. Two possible parametrizations (three neutrino masses versus the lightest neutrino mass plus the two oscillation mass splittings) and priors (linear versus logarithmic) are examined. We find that the preference for NO is only driven by neutrino oscillation data. Moreover, the values of the Bayes factor indicate that the evidence for NO is strong only when the scan is performed over the three neutrino masses with logarithmic priors; for every other combination of parameterization and prior, the preference for NO is only weak. As a by-product of our Bayesian analyses, we are able to a) compare the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
