Observations of white-light flares in NOAA active region 11515: high occurrence rate and relationship with magnetic transients

TL;DR

This study reveals that white-light flares are more common than previously thought, often weak, and closely linked with magnetic transients, suggesting many flares with magnetic changes are actually white-light flares.

Contribution

It provides the first comprehensive analysis of the frequency and magnetic relationship of white-light flares in NOAA active region 11515.

Findings

At least 28.6% of C-class and above flares are white-light flares.

WLFs are associated with significant magnetic transients and often occur in a narrow magnetic ribbon.

Most WLFs are weak, with an average 8.1% intensity enhancement.

Abstract

There are two goals in this study. One is to investigate how frequently white-light flares (WLFs) occur in a flare-productive active region (NOAA active region 11515). The other is to investigate the relationship between WLFs and magnetic transients (MTs). We use the full-disk continuum filtergrams and line-of-sight magnetograms taken by SDO/HMI to identify WLFs and MTs, respectively. Images taken by SDO/AIA are also used to show the morphology of the flares in the upper atmosphere. We found at least 20 WLFs out of a total of 70 flares above C class (28.6%) in NOAA active region 11515 during its passage across the solar disk. Each of these WLFs occurred in a small region, with a short duration of about 5 minutes. The enhancement of white-light continuum intensity is usually small, with an average enhancement of 8.1%. The 20 WLFs observed were found along an unusual configuration of the magnetic field characterized by a narrow ribbon of negative field. Furthermore, the WLFs were found to be accompanied by MTs, with radical changes in magnetic field strength (or even a sign reversal) observed during the flare. In contrast, there is no obvious signature of MTs in those 50 flares without white-light enhancements. Our results suggest that WLFs occur much more frequently than what was previously thought, with most WLFs being fairly weak enhancements. This may explain why WLFs are not frequently reported. Our observations also suggest that MTs and WLFs are closely related and appear co-spatial and co-temporal, when considering HMI data. A larger enhancement of WL emission is often accompanied by a larger change of the line-of-sight component of the unsigned magnetic field. Considering the close relationship between MTs and WLFs, many previously reported flares with MTs may be WLFs.