Content Based Status Updates

TL;DR

This paper analyzes the age of information in a system transmitting high and low priority status updates, comparing FCFS and preemption policies, and finds that preemption may increase the age of low priority updates under certain conditions.

Contribution

It provides a comparative analysis of FCFS and preemption transmission schemes for priority-based status updates, deriving closed-form age expressions and revealing limitations of preemption for low priority streams.

Findings

Preemption can increase the age of low priority updates with exponential service times.

Closed-form expressions for average age and peak age are derived for both schemes.

Preemption is not always optimal for low priority streams in age minimization.

Abstract

Consider a stream of status updates generated by a source, where each update is of one of two types: high priority or ordinary (low priority). These updates are to be transmitted through a network to a monitor. However, the transmission policy of each packet depends on the type of stream it belongs to. For the low priority stream, we analyze and compare the performances of two transmission schemes: (i) Ordinary updates are served in a First-Come-First-Served (FCFS) fashion, whereas, in (ii), the ordinary updates are transmitted according to an M/G/1/1 with preemption policy. In both schemes, high priority updates are transmitted according to an M/G/1/1 with preemption policy and receive preferential treatment. An arriving priority update discards and replaces any currently-in-service high priority update, and preempts (with eventual resume for scheme (i)) any ordinary update. We model the arrival processes of the two kinds of updates, in both schemes, as independent Poisson processes. For scheme (i), we find the arrival and service rates under which the system is stable and give closed-form expressions for average peak age and a lower bound on the average age of the ordinary stream. For scheme (ii), we derive closed-form expressions for the average age and average peak age of the high priority and low priority streams. We finally show that, if the service time is exponentially distributed, the M/M/1/1 with preemption policy leads to an average age of the low priority stream higher than the one achieved using the FCFS scheme. Therefore, the M/M//1/1 with preemption policy, when applied on the low priority stream of updates and in the presence of a higher priority scheme, is not anymore the optimal transmission policy from an age point of view.