The non-triviality of the vacuum in light-front quantization: An elementary treatment
John Collins

TL;DR
This paper reviews the misconception that the vacuum is trivial in light-front quantization, clarifying when and why standard perturbation theory rules need modification due to non-trivial vacuum effects.
Contribution
It provides an elementary explanation of the conditions under which light-front perturbation theory rules fail, correcting common misconceptions about vacuum triviality.
Findings
The vacuum in light-front quantization can be non-trivial in certain cases.
Standard light-front perturbation rules require modification in specific scenarios.
The paper clarifies the circumstances leading to the failure of elementary derivations.
Abstract
It is often stated that the vacuum is trivial when light-front (null-plane) quantization is applied to a quantum field theory, in contrast to the situation with equal-time quantization. In fact, it is has long been known that the statement is false, and that in certain cases the standard rules for light-front perturbation theory need modification. This paper gives an elementary review of these issues, including an explanation of how and when there is a failure of the elementary derivation of the rules for light-front perturbation theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics · Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
