Confusing binaries: the role of stellar binaries in biasing disk properties in the Galactic Center
Smadar Naoz, Andrea M. Ghez, Aurelien Hees, Tuan Do, Gunther Witzel,, Jessica R. Lu

TL;DR
This study shows that stellar binaries in the Galactic Center can significantly bias the inferred properties of the young stellar disk, affecting measurements of disk membership, eccentricity, and width, and potentially resolving existing theoretical challenges.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that accounting for stellar binaries alters the perceived orbital properties of the disk, suggesting previous estimates of disk membership and eccentricity may be underestimated.
Findings
Binary motion increases the apparent disk width to ~11.2 degrees.
Unaccounted binaries can produce an apparent eccentricity distribution averaging 0.23.
Considering binaries suggests the true disk membership could be higher than observed.
Abstract
The population of young stars near the Supermassive black hole (SMBH) in the Galactic Center (GC) has presented an unexpected challenge to theories of star formation. Kinematics measurements of these stars have revealed a stellar disk structure (with an apparent 20% disk membership) that has provided important clues to the origin of these mysterious young stars. However many of the apparent disk properties are difficult to explain, including the low disk membership fraction and the high eccentricities, given the youth of this population. Thus far, all efforts to derive the properties of this disk have made the simplifying assumption that stars at the GC are single stars. Nevertheless, stellar binaries are prevalent in our Galaxy, and recent investigations suggested that they may also be abundant in the Galactic Center. Here we show that binaries in the disk can largely alter the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
