Association fairness in Wi-Fi and LTE-U coexistence

TL;DR

This paper investigates how LTE-U's high duty cycle impacts Wi-Fi's ability to transmit beacons during initial association, revealing significant fairness issues through theoretical and experimental analysis.

Contribution

It provides the first combined theoretical and experimental analysis of association fairness issues caused by LTE-U's high duty cycle in Wi-Fi coexistence.

Findings

High LTE-U duty cycle significantly impairs Wi-Fi beacon transmission and reception.

LTE-U/Wi-Fi coexistence is less fair than Wi-Fi/Wi-Fi coexistence during initial association.

Reducing LTE-U duty cycle improves Wi-Fi association success.

Abstract

In this paper we address the issue of association fairness when Wi-Fi and LTE unlicensed (LTE-U) coexist on the same channel in the unlicensed 5 GHz band. Since beacon transmission is the first step in starting the association process in Wi-Fi, we define association fairness as how fair LTE-U is in allowing Wi-Fi to start transmitting beacons on a channel that it occupies with a very large duty cycle. According to the LTE-U specification, if a LTE-U base station determines that a channel is vacant, it can transmit for up to 20 ms and turn OFF for only 1 ms, resulting in a duty cycle of 95%. In an area with heavy spectrum usage, there will be cases when a Wi-Fi access point wishes to share the same channel, as it does today with Wi-Fi. We study, both theoretically and experimentally, the effect that such a large LTE-U duty cycle can have on the association process, specifically Wi-Fi beacon transmission and reception. We demonstrate via an experimental set-up using National Instrument (NI) USRPs that a significant percentage of Wi-Fi beacons will either not be transmitted in a timely fashion or will not be received at the LTE-U BS thus making it difficult for the LTE-U BS to adapt its duty cycle in response to the Wi-Fi usage. Our experimental results corroborate our theoretical analysis. We compare the results with Wi-Fi/Wi-Fi coexistence and demonstrate that LTE-U/Wi-Fi coexistence is not fair when it comes to initial association since there is a much larger percentage of beacon errors in the latter case. Hence, the results in the paper indicate that in order to maintain association fairness, a LTE-U BS should not transmit at such high duty cycles, even if it deems the channel to be vacant.