The timeline of the Lunar bombardment - revisited
A. Morbidelli, D.Nesvorny, V. Laurenz, S. Marchi, D.C. Rubie, L., Elkins-Tanton, M. Wieczorek, S.Jacobson

TL;DR
This paper revisits lunar impact history, analyzing impact flux scenarios and HSE data, suggesting the Moon's bombardment was either a cataclysm or a tail-end event, with implications for Mars as well.
Contribution
It introduces updated impact flux simulations and proposes a new hypothesis on HSE sequestration, reconciling lunar impact history with geochemical evidence.
Findings
Only the cataclysm scenario explains the HSE data under traditional assumptions.
HSE sequestration during magma ocean crystallization allows the accretion tail scenario to fit the data.
Mars likely experienced a resurfacing event around 4.4Gy ago, consistent with impact history.
Abstract
The timeline of the lunar bombardment in the first Gy of the Solar System remains unclear. Some basin-forming impacts occurred 3.9-3.7Gy ago. Many other basins formed before, but their exact ages are not precisely known. There are two possible interpretations of the data: in the cataclysm scenario there was a surge in the impact rate approximately 3.9Gy ago, while in the accretion tail scenario the lunar bombardment declined since the era of planet formation and the latest basins formed in its tail-end. Here, we revisit the work of Morbidelli et al.(2012) that examined which scenario could be compatible with both the lunar crater record in the 3-4Gy period and the abundance of highly siderophile elements (HSE) in the lunar mantle. We use updated numerical simulations of the fluxes of impactors. Under the traditional assumption that the HSEs track the total amount of material accreted by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
