Sharp instruments for classifying compliers and generalizing causal effects
Edward H. Kennedy, Sivaraman Balakrishnan, Max G'Sell

TL;DR
This paper introduces methods to identify and predict compliers in instrumental variable studies, proposes a new measure called sharpness to evaluate IV quality, and demonstrates how these tools can improve causal effect estimation and policy relevance.
Contribution
It develops techniques for predicting compliers, introduces the sharpness measure for IV quality, and provides estimation methods with theoretical and empirical validation.
Findings
Sharpness effectively measures IV quality and compliance predictability.
Methods can accurately estimate effects even with weak IVs.
Simulation and application demonstrate practical utility of the proposed approaches.
Abstract
It is well-known that, without restricting treatment effect heterogeneity, instrumental variable (IV) methods only identify "local" effects among compliers, i.e., those subjects who take treatment only when encouraged by the IV. Local effects are controversial since they seem to only apply to an unidentified subgroup; this has led many to denounce these effects as having little policy relevance. However, we show that such pessimism is not always warranted: it is possible in some cases to accurately predict who compliers are, and obtain tight bounds on more generalizable effects in identifiable subgroups. We propose methods for doing so and study their estimation error and asymptotic properties, showing that these tasks can in theory be accomplished even with very weak IVs. We go on to introduce a new measure of IV quality called "sharpness", which reflects the variation in compliance…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
