On Rational Choice and the Representation of Decision Problems
Paulo Oliva, Philipp Zahn

TL;DR
This paper models how decision procedures operate on structured representations of choices, linking them to classical rational choice theory, and provides a framework for testing rational behavior using detailed choice process data.
Contribution
It introduces a formal framework connecting choice procedures on structured representations to classical choice functions, enabling new tests of rationality.
Findings
Characterizes choice procedures rationalizable by strict preferences.
Provides a canonical mapping between choice procedures and classical choice functions.
Framework can incorporate detailed web user choice data into economic models.
Abstract
In economic theory, an agent chooses from available alternatives -- modeled as a set. In decisions in the field or in the lab, however, agents do not have access to the set of alternatives at once. Instead, alternatives are represented by the outside world in a structured way. Online search results are lists of items, wine menus are often lists of lists (grouped by type or country), and online shopping often involves filtering items which can be viewed as navigating a tree. Representations constrain how an agent can choose. At the same time, an agent can also leverage representations when choosing, simplifying his/her choice process. For instance, in the case of a list he or she can use the order in which alternatives are represented to make his/her choice. In this paper, we model representations and decision procedures operating on them. We show that choice procedures are related to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
