SN 2016X: A Type II-P Supernova with A Signature of Shock Breakout from Explosion of A Massive Red Supergiant
F. Huang, X.-F. Wang, G. Hosseinzadeh, P. J. Brown, J. Mo, J.-J., Zhang, K.-C. Zhang, T.-M. Zhang, D.-A. Howell, I. Arcavi, C. McCully, S., Valenti, L.-M. Rui, H. Song, D.-F. Xiang, W.-X. Li, H. Lin, L.-F. Wang

TL;DR
SN 2016X, a Type II-P supernova, exhibited a prominent shock breakout signature, an unusually long rise time, and originated from a very massive red supergiant star, providing insights into massive star explosions.
Contribution
This study provides detailed UV and optical observations of SN 2016X, capturing shock breakout and characterizing its progenitor as one of the most massive red supergiants associated with SNe IIP.
Findings
Detected shock breakout signature in UV data.
Identified an unusually long 12.6-day rise time.
Progenitor estimated to be a massive red supergiant with 19-20 solar masses.
Abstract
We present extensive ultraviolet (UV) and optical photometry, as well as dense optical spectroscopy for type II Plateau (IIP) supernova SN 2016X that exploded in the nearby ( 15 Mpc) spiral galaxy UGC 08041. The observations span the period from 2 to 180 days after the explosion; in particular, the Swift UV data probably captured the signature of shock breakout associated with the explosion of SN 2016X. It shows very strong UV emission during the first week after explosion, with contribution of 20 -- 30% to the bolometric luminosity (versus 15% for normal SNe IIP). Moreover, we found that this supernova has an unusually long rise time of about 12.6 0.5 days in the band (versus 7.0 days for typical SNe IIP). The optical light curves and spectral evolution are quite similar to the fast-declining type IIP object SN 2013ej, except that SN 2016X has a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
