The NANOGrav 11-year Data Set: Pulsar-timing Constraints On The Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background
Z. Arzoumanian, P. T. Baker, A. Brazier, S. Burke-Spolaor, S. J., Chamberlin, S. Chatterjee, B. Christy, J. M. Cordes, N. J. Cornish, F., Crawford, H. Thankful Cromartie, K. Crowter, M. DeCesar, P. B. Demorest, T., Dolch, J. A. Ellis, R. D. Ferdman, E. Ferrara, W. M. Folkner

TL;DR
This paper reports on the 11-year NANOGrav data analysis, setting new upper limits on the stochastic gravitational-wave background while accounting for systematic uncertainties from Solar System ephemeris models.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach to mitigate Solar System ephemeris errors, providing the first robust PTA constraints on the GWB that incorporate these uncertainties.
Findings
Placed a 95% upper limit on GWB strain amplitude of 1.45e-15 at 1 yr^-1
Improved the GWB upper limit by a factor of 2 over previous 9-year results
Constrained cosmic-string tension and primordial GWB energy density with enhanced robustness
Abstract
We search for an isotropic stochastic gravitational-wave background (GWB) in the newly released -year dataset from the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav). While we find no significant evidence for a GWB, we place constraints on a GWB from a population of supermassive black-hole binaries, cosmic strings, and a primordial GWB. For the first time, we find that the GWB upper limits and detection statistics are sensitive to the Solar System ephemeris (SSE) model used, and that SSE errors can mimic a GWB signal. We developed an approach that bridges systematic SSE differences, producing the first PTA constraints that are robust against SSE uncertainties. We thus place a upper limit on the GW strain amplitude of at a frequency of yr for a fiducial power-law spectrum, and with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
