A Novel Hybrid Biometric Electronic Voting System: Integrating Finger Print and Face Recognition

TL;DR

This paper presents a hybrid biometric electronic voting system combining fingerprint and facial recognition to improve accuracy and security, utilizing machine learning classifiers and achieving 91% facial recognition accuracy under nominal lighting conditions.

Contribution

It introduces a novel hybrid biometric voting system integrating face and fingerprint recognition with cascaded classifiers for enhanced accuracy and reliability in election verification.

Findings

Achieves 91% facial recognition accuracy under nominal lighting.

Performs better than single biometric schemes or other classifiers.

Provides a more secure and accurate voting verification method.

Abstract

A novel hybrid design based electronic voting system is proposed, implemented and analyzed. The proposed system uses two voter verification techniques to give better results in comparison to single identification based systems. Finger print and facial recognition based methods are used for voter identification. Cross verification of a voter during an election process provides better accuracy than single parameter identification method. The facial recognition system uses Viola-Jones algorithm along with rectangular Haar feature selection method for detection and extraction of features to develop a biometric template and for feature extraction during the voting process. Cascaded machine learning based classifiers are used for comparing the features for identity verification using GPCA (Generalized Principle Component Analysis) and K-NN (K-Nearest Neighbor). It is accomplished through comparing the Eigen-vectors of the extracted features with the biometric template pre-stored in the election regulatory body database. The results of the proposed system show that the proposed cascaded design based system performs better than the systems using other classifiers or separate schemes i.e. facial or finger print based schemes. The proposed system will be highly useful for real time applications due to the reason that it has 91% accuracy under nominal light in terms of facial recognition. with bags of paper votes. The central station compiles and publishes the names of winners and losers through television and radio stations. This method is useful only if the whole process is completed in a transparent way. However, there are some drawbacks to this system. These include higher expenses, longer time to complete the voting process, fraudulent practices by the authorities administering elections as well as malpractices by the voters [1]. These challenges result in manipulated election results.