Using Random Variables to Predict Experimental Outcomes
James D. Stein

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that certain experiments, modeled as Bernoulli trials with success probability over 0.5, can be predicted more accurately than their success probability suggests, revealing surprising predictive capabilities.
Contribution
It introduces a novel insight that some Bernoulli trials allow for prediction with accuracy exceeding their success probability, challenging conventional assumptions.
Findings
Predictive accuracy surpasses success probability p in certain Bernoulli trials
Experiments with p > 0.5 can be predicted with probability > p
Highlights potential for improved outcome prediction in probabilistic experiments
Abstract
We shall show in this paper that there are experiments which are Bernoulli trials with success probability p > 0.5, and which have the curious feature that it is possible to correctly predict the outcome with probability > p.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFault Detection and Control Systems · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models · Neural Networks and Applications
