Restrictions on Potential Automatic Structures on Thompson's Group F
Jeremy Hauze

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that many languages close to geodesic representatives cannot form an automatic structure for Thompson's Group F, by showing length restrictions lead to contradictions in the Cayley graph.
Contribution
It introduces new restrictions on automatic structures for Thompson's Group F based on length and path analysis in the Cayley graph.
Findings
Certain languages cannot be part of an automatic structure for F.
Length restrictions lead to contradictions in path choices.
Automatic structures are limited by these geometric constraints.
Abstract
We show that a large class of languages in the standard finite generating set X = {} cannot be part of an automatic structure for Thompson's Group F. These languages are ones that accept at least one representative of each element of F of word length that is within a fixed constant of a geodesic representative of the element. To accomplish this, we look at a specific element of F and trace two different paths through the Cayley graph to that element. We show that staying within the length restrictions along these two paths would force that element to have contradictory properties.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric and Algebraic Topology · semigroups and automata theory · Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
