The NANOGrav 11-year Data Set: High-precision timing of 45 Millisecond Pulsars
Zaven Arzoumanian, Adam Brazier, Sarah Burke-Spolaor, Sydney, Chamberlin, Shami Chatterjee, Brian Christy, James M. Cordes, Neil J., Cornish, Fronefield Crawford, H. Thankful Cromartie, Kathryn Crowter, Megan, E. DeCesar, Paul B. Demorest, Timothy Dolch, Justin A. Ellis

TL;DR
This paper presents high-precision timing data over 11 years for 45 millisecond pulsars, aiming to detect low-frequency gravitational waves, and introduces new methods for data processing and noise modeling.
Contribution
It provides comprehensive timing solutions, new parallax and Shapiro delay measurements, and advanced noise characterization techniques for millisecond pulsars.
Findings
11 pulsars exhibit significant red noise
New parallax and Shapiro delay measurements obtained
Noise spectral indices are smaller than in non-recycled pulsars
Abstract
We present high-precision timing data over time spans of up to 11 years for 45 millisecond pulsars observed as part of the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav) project, aimed at detecting and characterizing low-frequency gravitational waves. The pulsars were observed with the Arecibo Observatory and/or the Green Bank Telescope at frequencies ranging from 327 MHz to 2.3 GHz. Most pulsars were observed with approximately monthly cadence, with six high--timing-precision pulsars observed weekly, and all were observed at widely separated frequencies at each observing epoch in order to fit for time-variable dispersion delays. We describe our methods for data processing, time-of-arrival (TOA) calculation, and the implementation of a new, automated method for removing outlier TOAs. We fit a timing model for each pulsar that includes spin, astrometric, and, if…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
