Practical Challenges in Explicit Ethical Machine Reasoning
Louise Dennis, Michael Fisher

TL;DR
This paper explores practical challenges in implementing ethical reasoning in machines, emphasizing the need for complex, real-time, verifiable, and multi-objective systems that utilize heterogeneous evidential reasoning.
Contribution
It proposes a general architecture with a declarative ethical arbiter and multiple evidential reasoners to address practical challenges in ethical machine reasoning.
Findings
Identifies key practical challenges such as multi-objectivity and real-time operation.
Proposes a modular architecture to address these challenges.
Highlights the importance of verifiability and heterogeneity in evidential reasoning.
Abstract
We examine implemented systems for ethical machine reasoning with a view to identifying the practical challenges (as opposed to philosophical challenges) posed by the area. We identify a need for complex ethical machine reasoning not only to be multi-objective, proactive, and scrutable but that it must draw on heterogeneous evidential reasoning. We also argue that, in many cases, it needs to operate in real time and be verifiable. We propose a general architecture involving a declarative ethical arbiter which draws upon multiple evidential reasoners each responsible for a particular ethical feature of the system's environment. We claim that this architecture enables some separation of concerns among the practical challenges that ethical machine reasoning poses.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
