How to estimate the sample mean and standard deviation from the five number summary?
Jiandong Shi, Dehui Luo, Hong Weng, Xian-Tao Zeng, Lu Lin, and Tiejun Tong

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new, more accurate method for estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the five number summary, enhancing meta-analyses in clinical research.
Contribution
It proposes a smoothly weighted estimator for the standard deviation that incorporates sample size, improving accuracy over existing methods.
Findings
New estimator outperforms Wan et al.'s method for normal data
Performs favorably for non-normal data
Provides more accurate estimates in real data applications
Abstract
In some clinical studies, researchers may report the five number summary (including the sample median, the first and third quartiles, and the minimum and maximum values) rather than the sample mean and standard deviation. To conduct meta-analysis for pooling studies, one needs to first estimate the sample mean and standard deviation from the five number summary. A number of studies have been proposed in the recent literature to solve this problem. However, none of the existing estimators for the standard deviation is satisfactory for practical use. After a brief review of the existing literature, we point out that Wan et al.'s method (BMC Med Res Methodol 14:135, 2014) has a serious limitation in estimating the standard deviation from the five number summary. To improve it, we propose a smoothly weighted estimator by incorporating the sample size information and derive the optimal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMeta-analysis and systematic reviews
