A direct calibration of the IRX-{\beta} relation in Lyman-break Galaxies at z=3-5
M.P. Koprowski, K.E.K. Coppin, J.E. Geach, R.J. McLure, O. Almaini,, A.W. Blain, M. Bremer, N. Bourne, S.C. Chapman, C.J. Conselice, J.S. Dunlop,, D. Farrah, W. Hartley, A. Karim, K.K. Knudsen, M.J. Micha{\l}owski, D. Scott,, C. Simpson, D.J.B. Smith, P.P. van der Werf

TL;DR
This study investigates the IRX-{eta} relation in high-redshift Lyman-break galaxies, confirming its consistency with a Calzetti-like law up to z~5 and highlighting the importance of stellar mass in dust correction.
Contribution
It provides a direct calibration of the IRX-{eta} relation at z=3-5 using stacking analysis, and emphasizes the role of stellar mass in dust correction methods.
Findings
No significant evolution of IRX-{eta} relation up to z~5
IRX-{eta} relation is consistent with a Calzetti-like attenuation law
IRX-stellar mass relation is a better proxy for dust correction
Abstract
We use a sample of 4178 Lyman break galaxies (LBGs) at z = 3, 4 and 5 in the UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey (UKIDSS) Ultra Deep Survey (UDS) field to investigate the relationship between the observed slope of the stellar continuum emission in the ultraviolet, {\beta}, and the thermal dust emission, as quantified via the so-called 'infrared excess' (IRX = LIR/LUV). Through a stacking analysis we directly measure the 850-{\mu}m flux density of LBGs in our deep (0.9mJy) James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT) SCUBA-2 850-{\mu}m map, as well as deep public Herschel/SPIRE 250-, 350- and 500-{\mu}m imaging. We establish functional forms for the IRX-{\beta} relation to z ~ 5, confirming that there is no significant redshift evolution of the relation and that the resulting average IRX-{\beta} curve is consistent with a Calzetti-like attenuation law. We compare our results with recent work in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
