Whatever Does Not Kill Deep Reinforcement Learning, Makes It Stronger
Vahid Behzadan, Arslan Munir

TL;DR
This paper explores the robustness of deep reinforcement learning agents against adversarial attacks, showing that they can recover and adapt, and that training under attack improves test-time resilience.
Contribution
It demonstrates that deep RL agents can recover from training-time attacks and that adversarial training enhances robustness, comparing exploration strategies for improved resilience.
Findings
DQN agents can recover from noncontiguous training-time attacks.
Policies trained under adversarial conditions are more robust to test-time attacks.
Adversarial training improves overall robustness of deep RL agents.
Abstract
Recent developments have established the vulnerability of deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) to policy manipulation attacks via adversarial perturbations. In this paper, we investigate the robustness and resilience of deep RL to training-time and test-time attacks. Through experimental results, we demonstrate that under noncontiguous training-time attacks, Deep Q-Network (DQN) agents can recover and adapt to the adversarial conditions by reactively adjusting the policy. Our results also show that policies learned under adversarial perturbations are more robust to test-time attacks. Furthermore, we compare the performance of -greedy and parameter-space noise exploration methods in terms of robustness and resilience against adversarial perturbations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Advanced Malware Detection Techniques · Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research
