Null Dynamical State Models of Human Cognitive Dysfunction

TL;DR

This paper explores how drastic environmental changes cause human cognitive dysfunction and models these states using dynamical machine states, linking them to human qualia and offering insights into AI consciousness.

Contribution

It introduces a novel class of semantic symbols linked to environmental surprise, models human dysfunction as dynamical states in learning machines, and connects these states to human qualia.

Findings

Dysfunctional human responses correspond to null dynamical states in machines.

Environmental changes can induce inoperative programs in both humans and machines.

The model explains human experiences like attachment and grief through dynamical states.

Abstract

The hard problem in artificial intelligence asks how the shuffling of syntactical symbols in a program can lead to systems which experience semantics and qualia. We address this question in three stages. First, we introduce a new class of human semantic symbols which appears when unexpected and drastic environmental change causes humans to become surprised, confused, uncertain, and in extreme cases, unresponsive, passive and dysfunctional. For this class of symbols, pre-learned programs become inoperative so these syntactical programs cannot be the source of experienced qualia. Second, we model the dysfunctional human response to a radically changed environment as being the natural response of any learning machine facing novel inputs from well outside its previous training set. In this situation, learning machines are unable to extract information from their input and will typically enter a dynamical state characterized by null outputs and a lack of response. This state immediately predicts and explains the characteristics of the semantic experiences of humans in similar circumstances. In the third stage, we consider learning machines trained to implement multiple functions in simple sequential programs using environmental data to specify subroutine names, control flow instructions, memory calls, and so on. Drastic change in any of these environmental inputs can again lead to inoperative programs. By examining changes specific to people or locations we can model human cognitive symbols featuring these dependencies, such as attachment and grief. Our approach links known dynamical machines states with human qualia and thus offers new insight into the hard problem of artificial intelligence.