Tight Hardness for Shortest Cycles and Paths in Sparse Graphs
Andrea Lincoln, Virginia Vassilevska Williams, Ryan Williams

TL;DR
This paper establishes tight conditional lower bounds for several shortest cycle and path problems in sparse graphs, showing that certain algorithms cannot be significantly improved under common complexity hypotheses.
Contribution
It proves that for sparse graphs, many fundamental problems cannot be solved faster than existing algorithms unless certain longstanding complexity hypotheses fail.
Findings
No $O(n^2 + mn^{1- ext{epsilon}})$ algorithms for key problems in sparse graphs.
Conditional lower bounds based on the hardness of the $(2 ext{l}+1)$-Clique problem.
Results extend to unweighted sparse graph problems like $k$-cycle and Wiener index.
Abstract
Fine-grained reductions have established equivalences between many core problems with -time algorithms on -node weighted graphs, such as Shortest Cycle, All-Pairs Shortest Paths (APSP), Radius, Replacement Paths, Second Shortest Paths, and so on. These problems also have -time algorithms on -edge -node weighted graphs, and such algorithms have wider applicability. Are these bounds optimal when ? Starting from the hypothesis that the minimum weight -Clique problem in edge weighted graphs requires time, we prove that for all sparsities of the form , there is no time algorithm for for \emph{any} of the below problems: Minimum Weight -Cycle in a directed weighted graph, Shortest Cycle in a directed weighted graph, APSP in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
