The stellar content of the XMM-Newton slew survey

TL;DR

This paper analyzes the stellar content of the XMM-Newton slew survey by crossmatching with Gaia, 2MASS, and Tycho2, revealing many previously unknown X-ray emitting stars and characterizing their properties.

Contribution

It introduces an automated method for identifying stellar X-ray sources in the XMMSL2 catalog with high reliability and completeness, including validation against other surveys.

Findings

Identified 6815 stellar sources in XMMSL2, with 25% being new X-ray sources.

Most stellar sources are late-type dwarfs with high X-ray activity.

The sample shows many sources with X-ray emission above previous saturation limits.

Abstract

We present a detailed analysis of the stellar content of the current version of the XMM-Newton slew survey (XMMSL2). Since stars emit only a small fraction of their total luminosity in the X-ray band, the stellar XMMSL2 sources ought to have relatively bright optical counterparts. Therefore the stellar identifications are obtained by an automatic crossmatch of the XMMSL2 catalog with the first Gaia data release (Gaia DR1), the 2MASS and the Tycho2 catalogs. The reliability of this procedure is verified by a comparison with the individually classified Einstein Observatory medium sensitivity survey X-ray sources and by a crossmatch with the Chandra Source Catalog. We identify 6815 of the 23252 unique XMMSL2 sources to be stellar sources, while 893 sources are flagged as unreliable. For every counterpart a matching probability is estimated based upon the distance between the XMMSL2 source and the counterpart. Given this matching probability the sample is expected to be reliable to 96.7 % and complete to 96.3 %. The sample contains stars of all spectral types and luminosity classes, with late-type dwarfs having the largest share. For many stellar sources the fractional contribution of the X-ray band to the total energy output is found above the saturation limit of previous studies ($L_\mathrm{X}/L_\mathrm{bol}=10^{-3}$), because the XMMSL2 sources are more affected by flares due to their short exposure times of typically 6 s. A comparison with the "Second ROSAT all-sky survey (2RXS) source catalog" shows that about 25 % of the stellar XMMSL2 sources are previously unknown X-ray sources. The results of our identification procedure can be accessed via VizieR.