A Collection of Lower Bounds for Online Matching on the Line
Antonios Antoniadis, Carsten Fischer, Andreas T\"onnis

TL;DR
This paper establishes a fundamental lower bound of ()log n on the competitive ratio for a broad class of natural online algorithms for the line matching problem, highlighting inherent limitations.
Contribution
It proves that any local, symmetric, or nearly symmetric online algorithm cannot achieve better than ()log n competitiveness, extending to randomized algorithms within this class.
Findings
Deterministic algorithms with local and symmetric decision rules are ()log n-competitive.
The ()log n lower bound extends to certain randomized algorithms.
The result applies to all known natural algorithms in the literature.
Abstract
In the online matching on the line problem, the task is to match a set of requests online to a given set of servers . The distance metric between any two points in is a line metric and the objective for the online algorithm is to minimize the sum of distances between matched server-request pairs. This problem is well-studied and - despite recent improvements - there is still a large gap between the best known lower and upper bounds: The best known deterministic algorithm for the problem is -competitive, while the best known deterministic lower bound is . The lower and upper bounds for randomized algorithms are and respectively. We prove that any deterministic online algorithm which in each round: bases the matching decision only on information local to the current request, and is symmetric (in the sense that the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
