Three Qubit Randomized Benchmarking
David C. McKay, Sarah Sheldon, John A. Smolin, Jerry M. Chow, and Jay, M. Gambetta

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates three-qubit randomized benchmarking on transmon qubits, establishing a scalable fidelity metric and revealing how errors scale with different gate configurations and coherent errors.
Contribution
It introduces three-qubit RB for fixed-frequency transmon qubits and shows how three-qubit errors relate to one- and two-qubit errors, highlighting its uniqueness as a multiqubit metric.
Findings
Measured three-qubit error per Clifford: 0.106 (all-to-all), 0.207 (linear)
Predicted three-qubit errors from one- and two-qubit errors using simultaneous RB
Coherent errors can significantly increase three-qubit errors beyond predictions
Abstract
As quantum circuits increase in size, it is critical to establish scalable multiqubit fidelity metrics. Here we investigate three-qubit randomized benchmarking (RB) with fixed-frequency transmon qubits coupled to a common bus with pairwise microwave-activated interactions (cross-resonance). We measure, for the first time, a three-qubit error per Clifford of 0.106 for all-to-all gate connectivity and 0.207 for linear gate connectivity. Furthermore, by introducing mixed dimensionality simultaneous RB --- simultaneous one- and two-qubit RB --- we show that the three-qubit errors can be predicted from the one- and two-qubit errors. However, by introducing certain coherent errors to the gates we can increase the three-qubit error to 0.302, an increase that is not predicted by a proportionate increase in the one- and two-qubit errors from simultaneous RB. This demonstrates three-qubit RB as a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
