Three IQs of AI Systems and their Testing Methods
Feng Liu, Yong Shi, Ying Liu

TL;DR
This paper introduces three distinct IQ evaluation methods—General IQ, Service IQ, and Value IQ—for assessing artificial intelligence systems based on different objectives, including surpassing human intelligence and serving human needs.
Contribution
It proposes a comprehensive framework for quantifying AI intelligence levels using three new IQ metrics based on standard and extended Von Neumann architectures.
Findings
General IQ assesses AI surpassing human intelligence
Service IQ evaluates AI's ability to serve humans effectively
Value IQ measures the cost-effectiveness of AI systems
Abstract
The rapid development of artificial intelligence has brought the artificial intelligence threat theory as well as the problem about how to evaluate the intelligence level of intelligent products. Both need to find a quantitative method to evaluate the intelligence level of intelligence systems, including human intelligence. Based on the standard intelligence system and the extended Von Neumann architecture, this paper proposes General IQ, Service IQ and Value IQ evaluation methods for intelligence systems, depending on different evaluation purposes. Among them, the General IQ of intelligence systems is to answer the question of whether the artificial intelligence can surpass the human intelligence, which is reflected in putting the intelligence systems on an equal status and conducting the unified evaluation. The Service IQ and Value IQ of intelligence systems are used to answer the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTechnology Assessment and Management
