An approximate JKR solution for a general contact, including rough contacts

TL;DR

This paper presents a simple approximate solution for adhesive contact problems under the JKR regime, applicable to rough surfaces, based on generalizing the energetic derivation and using macroscopic quantities.

Contribution

The paper introduces a closed-form approximate solution for adhesive contact that accounts for rough surfaces and is applicable to a wide range of configurations, including axisymmetric contacts.

Findings

Solution depends only on surface roughness parameters.

Approximates full solution for elastic rough solids with Gaussian roughness.

Tends to adhesiveless result for large roughness amplitudes.

Abstract

In the present note, we suggest a simple closed form approximate solution to the adhesive contact problem under the so-called JKR regime. The derivation is based on generalizing the original JKR energetic derivation assuming calculation of the strain energy in adhesiveless contact, and unloading at constant contact area. The underlying assumption is that the contact area distributions are the same as under adhesiveless conditions (for an appropriately increased normal load), so that in general the stress intensity factors will not be exactly equal at all contact edges. The solution is simply that the indentation is D=D1-Sqrt(2w A'/P") where w is surface energy, D1 is the adhesiveless indentation, A' is the first derivative of contact area and P" the second derivative of the load with respect to indentation. The solution only requires macroscopic quantities, and not very elaborate local distributions, and is exact in many configurations like axisymmetric contacts. It permits also an estimate of the full solution for elastic rough solids with Gaussian multiple scales of roughness, which so far was lacking, using known adhesiveless simple results. The solution turns out to depend only on rms amplitude and slopes of the surface, and in the fractal limit, slopes would grow without limit, tends to the adhesiveless result - although in this limit the JKR model is inappropriate. However, a more solid result is that the solution would also go to adhesiveless result for large rms amplitude of roughness h_{rms}, irrespective of the small scale details, and in agreement with common sense and previous models by the author.