Reconciling observed and simulated stellar halo masses
Robyn E. Sanderson (1), Shea Garrison-Kimmel (1), Andrew Wetzel, (1,2,3) Tsang Keung Chan (4), Philip F. Hopkins (1), Du\v{s}an Kere\v{s} (4),, Ivanna Escala (1), Claude-Andr\'e Faucher-Gigu\`ere (5), Xiangcheng Ma (1), ((1) Caltech, (2) Carnegie

TL;DR
This study uses cosmological simulations to evaluate methods for estimating stellar halo masses from images, revealing systematic underestimations and biases, and suggests metallicity or color data could improve accuracy.
Contribution
It demonstrates that common observational methods underestimate accreted stellar mass and introduces biases, proposing metallicity or color information as a potential solution.
Findings
Observational methods underestimate accreted stellar mass by up to a factor of ten.
Estimated accreted stellar mass depends on galaxy size and mass, causing biases.
Metallicity or color data can help distinguish accreted stars in observations.
Abstract
We use cosmological hydrodynamical simulations of Milky-Way-mass galaxies from the FIRE project to evaluate various strategies for estimating the mass of a galaxy's stellar halo from deep, integrated-light images. We find good agreement with integrated-light observations if we mimic observational methods to measure the mass of the stellar halo by selecting regions of an image via projected radius relative to the disk scale length or by their surface density in stellar mass . However, these observational methods systematically underestimate the accreted stellar component, defined in our (and most) simulations as the mass of stars formed outside of the host galaxy, by up to a factor of ten, since the accreted component is centrally concentrated and therefore substantially obscured by the galactic disk. Furthermore, these observational methods introduce spurious dependencies of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
