On non-normality and classification of amplification mechanisms in stability and resolvent analysis
Sean Symon, Kevin Rosenberg, Scott T. M. Dawson, Beverley J., McKeon

TL;DR
This paper investigates the non-normality of resolvent modes in fluid flows, proposing a measure based on the inverse inner product to quantify non-normality and analyzing how it influences flow structure amplification.
Contribution
It introduces a new measure for non-normality of resolvent modes and applies it to flow stability analysis, linking non-normality to flow structure amplification in different flow regimes.
Findings
The inverse inner product effectively quantifies non-normality in flow models.
Normal amplification mechanisms allow simplified resolvent mode relationships.
Non-normality explains the amplification of turbulent flow structures.
Abstract
We seek to quantify non-normality of the most amplified resolvent modes and predict their features based on the characteristics of the base or mean velocity profile. A 2-by-2 model linear Navier-Stokes (LNS) operator illustrates how non-normality from mean shear distributes perturbation energy in different velocity components of the forcing and response modes. The inverse of their inner product, which is unity for a purely normal mechanism, is proposed as a measure to quantify non-normality. In flows where there is downstream spatial dependence of the base/mean, mean flow advection separates the spatial support of forcing and response modes which impacts the inner product. Success of mean stability analysis depends on the normality of amplification. If the amplification is normal, the resolvent operator written in its dyadic representation reveals that the adjoint and forward stability…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
