The dimensionless dissipation rate and the Kolmogorov (1941) hypothesis of local stationarity in freely decaying isotropic turbulence
W.D. McComb, R.B. Fairhurst

TL;DR
This paper derives an expression for the dimensionless dissipation rate in turbulence, examines the validity of the local stationarity hypothesis underlying Kolmogorov's 4/5 law, and discusses implications for turbulence theory and measurements.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical analysis of the local stationarity assumption in turbulence and proposes a method to quantify its error using the asymptotic dissipation rate.
Findings
Neglecting the time-derivative in the Kolmogorov equation cannot be justified solely by inertial range or high Reynolds numbers.
The hypothesis of local stationarity may lead to significant errors in certain conditions.
Scale invariance in wavenumber space holds at infinite Reynolds numbers, supporting the uncorrected -5/3 energy spectrum.
Abstract
An expression for the dimensionless dissipation rate was derived from the Karman-Howarth equation by asymptotic expansion of the second- and third- order structure functions in powers of the inverse Reynolds number. The implications of the time-derivative term for the assumption of local stationarity (or local equilibrium) which underpins the derivation of the Kolmogorov `4/5' law for the third-order structure function were studied. It was concluded that neglect of the time-derivative cannot be justified by reason of restriction to certain scales (the inertial range) nor to large Reynolds numbers. In principle, therefore, the hypothesis cannot be correct, although it may be a good approximation. It follows, at least in principle, that the quantitative aspects of the hypothesis of local stationarity could be tested by a comparison of the asymptotic dimensionless dissipation rate for free…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
