TL;DR
This paper proposes a simple learning rule enabling embodied agents to adaptively maintain criticality in their neural controllers, leading to behavioral regime transitions in reinforcement learning tasks, which may explain the prevalence of criticality in biological systems.
Contribution
It introduces a novel adaptive mechanism that maintains neural systems at criticality, demonstrated in embodied agents controlling neural networks at critical points.
Findings
Agents' neural controllers reach criticality during tasks
Criticality coincides with behavioral regime transitions
The mechanism offers a potential explanation for biological criticality
Abstract
Many biological and cognitive systems do not operate deep within one or other regime of activity. Instead, they are poised at critical points located at phase transitions in their parameter space. The pervasiveness of criticality suggests that there may be general principles inducing this behaviour, yet there is no well-founded theory for understanding how criticality is generated at a wide span of levels and contexts. In order to explore how criticality might emerge from general adaptive mechanisms, we propose a simple learning rule that maintains an internal organizational structure from a specific family of systems at criticality. We implement the mechanism in artificial embodied agents controlled by a neural network maintaining a correlation structure randomly sampled from an Ising model at critical temperature. Agents are evaluated in two classical reinforcement learning scenarios:…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
