Nonmeasurable sets and unions with respect to tree ideals
Marcin Michalski, Robert Ra{\l}owski, Szymon \.Zeberski

TL;DR
This paper explores nonmeasurability with respect to various tree ideals, constructs special nonmeasurable sets, introduces $ ext{T}$-Bernstein sets, and examines properties of $ ext{I}$-Luzin sets, revealing new interactions between these concepts.
Contribution
It introduces and studies new classes of nonmeasurable sets related to tree ideals and defines $ ext{T}$-Bernstein sets, expanding understanding of measure and category in descriptive set theory.
Findings
Existence of a set that is nonmeasurable with respect to multiple tree ideals and forms a dominating family.
Introduction of $ ext{T}$-Bernstein sets with specific intersection properties.
Results on the nonexistence of certain $ ext{I}$-Luzin sets and sum properties of Luzin and Sierpiński sets.
Abstract
In this paper we consider a notion of nonmeasurablity with respect to Marczewski and Marczewski-like tree ideals , , , and . We show that there exists a subset of the Baire space which is -, -, and -nonmeasurable, that forms dominating m.e.d. family. We introduce and investigate a notion of -Bernstein sets - sets that intersect but does not containt any body of a tree from a given family of trees . We also acquire some results on -Luzin sets, namely we prove that there are no -, -, and -Luzin sets and that if is a regular cardinal, then the algebraic sum (considered on the real line ) of a generalized Luzin set and a generalized Sierpi\'nski set belongs to , and .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
