Not All Stars Are the Sun: Empirical Calibration of the Mixing Length for Metal-Poor Stars Using One-dimensional Stellar Evolution Models
Meridith Joyce, Brian Chaboyer

TL;DR
This paper empirically calibrates the mixing length parameter for metal-poor stars, demonstrating that solar-calibrated values are ineffective and proposing adaptive mixing length for improved stellar modeling.
Contribution
It introduces empirically calibrated mixing length values for metal-poor stars and advocates for adaptive mixing length implementation in stellar evolution models.
Findings
Solar-calibrated mixing length is ineffective for metal-poor stars.
Empirical calibration provides specific mixing length values for different stars.
Adaptive mixing length improves model fidelity with asteroseismic data.
Abstract
Theoretical stellar evolution models are constructed and tailored to the best known, observationally derived characteristics of metal-poor ([Fe/H]) stars representing a range of evolutionary phases: subgiant HD140283, globular cluster M92, and four single, main sequence stars with well-determined parallaxes: HIP46120, HIP54639, HIP106924, and WOLF1137. It is found that the use of a solar-calibrated value of the mixing length parameter in models of these objects is ineffective at reproducing their observed properties. Empirically calibrated values of are presented for each object, accounting for uncertainties in the input physics employed in the models. It is advocated that the implementation of an adaptive mixing length is necessary in order for stellar evolution models to maintain fidelity in the era of asteroseismic observations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
