Measuring Model-independent Masses and Radii of Single-Lined Eclipsing Binaries: Analytic Precision Estimates
Daniel J. Stevens, B. Scott Gaudi, Keivan G. Stassun

TL;DR
This paper provides analytic estimates for achieving precise, model-independent stellar masses and radii of single-lined eclipsing binaries using empirical data, especially in the Gaia and TESS era, expanding the scope beyond double-lined systems.
Contribution
It introduces a framework for estimating the precision of stellar parameters from single-lined EBs using empirical methods, highlighting their potential to outperform model-dependent approaches.
Findings
Precise, model-independent mass and radius measurements are feasible for single-lined EBs.
Single-lined EBs vastly outnumber double-lined systems, enabling broader stellar sampling.
Methods are applicable to stars with transiting substellar companions, including M dwarfs.
Abstract
We derive analytic estimates for the ability with which one can obtain precise, empirical stellar masses and radii via single-lined eclipsing binaries (EBs) in the era of {\it Gaia\/} and {\it TESS}. Including stars that host transiting substellar companions, such single-lined EBs already number in the hundreds from ground-based transit surveys and will comprise a major component of the science yield from the upcoming {\it TESS\/} mission. We explore the requirements for obtaining a given fractional precision on the masses and radii of single-lined EBs using primarily empirical means: radial velocity and eclipse measurements along with either: estimates of the primary's (1) surface gravity from high-resolution spectroscopy; (2) radius inferred from parallax, effective temperature, and bolometric flux; or (3) surface gravity and density from asteroseismology. We then compare these…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
