
TL;DR
This study compares the optical color distributions of Neptunian and Jovian Trojans, revealing similar colors despite different environments, challenging existing theories about their origins and surface modification processes.
Contribution
It provides new observational data on Neptunian Trojans and highlights a puzzling similarity to Jovian Trojans that contradicts current understanding of their surface evolution.
Findings
Neptunian Trojans have a color distribution similar to Jovian Trojans.
The color distributions differ from those of Kuiper belt objects.
Surface modification processes cannot easily explain the similarity.
Abstract
The Trojan asteroids of Jupiter and Neptune are likely to have been captured from original heliocentric orbits in the dynamically excited ("hot") population of the Kuiper belt. However, it has long been known that the optical color distributions of the Jovian Trojans and the hot population are not alike. This difference has been reconciled with the capture hypothesis by assuming that the Trojans were resurfaced (for example, by sublimation of near-surface volatiles) upon inward migration from the Kuiper belt (where blackbody temperatures are 40 K) to Jupiter's orbit (125 K). Here, we examine the optical color distribution of the \textit{Neptunian} Trojans using a combination of new optical photometry and published data. We find a color distribution that is statistically indistinguishable from that of the Jovian Trojans but unlike any sub-population in the Kuiper belt. This…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstro and Planetary Science · Isotope Analysis in Ecology · Planetary Science and Exploration
