Symbol detection in online handwritten graphics using Faster R-CNN
Frank D. Julca-Aguilar, Nina S. T. Hirata

TL;DR
This paper assesses the effectiveness of Faster R-CNN for detecting symbols in online handwritten graphics, demonstrating its potential as a general detection method across different graphic types.
Contribution
It evaluates Faster R-CNN's applicability to handwritten graphics, highlighting its versatility and analyzing various configurations for improved symbol detection.
Findings
Faster R-CNN performs effectively on flowchart and mathematical datasets.
Different network configurations impact detection accuracy and efficiency.
The method enables potential development of general graphic understanding systems.
Abstract
Symbol detection techniques in online handwritten graphics (e.g. diagrams and mathematical expressions) consist of methods specifically designed for a single graphic type. In this work, we evaluate the Faster R-CNN object detection algorithm as a general method for detection of symbols in handwritten graphics. We evaluate different configurations of the Faster R-CNN method, and point out issues relative to the handwritten nature of the data. Considering the online recognition context, we evaluate efficiency and accuracy trade-offs of using Deep Neural Networks of different complexities as feature extractors. We evaluate the method on publicly available flowchart and mathematical expression (CROHME-2016) datasets. Results show that Faster R-CNN can be effectively used on both datasets, enabling the possibility of developing general methods for symbol detection, and furthermore, general…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsRegion Proposal Network · Softmax · Convolution · RoIPool · Faster R-CNN
