Energy efficiency studies for dual-grating dielectric laser-driven accelerators
Yelong Wei, Mark Ibison, Javier Resta-Lopez, Carsten Welsch, Rasmus, Ischebeck, Steven Jamison, Guoxing Xia, Micha Dehler, Eduard Prat, Jonathan, Smith

TL;DR
This study numerically demonstrates that combining a Bragg reflector and pulse-front-tilted laser illumination significantly enhances the energy efficiency of dual-grating dielectric laser-driven accelerators, achieving over 100% increase in energy gain.
Contribution
It introduces a combined scheme of Bragg reflector and PFT laser illumination to improve energy efficiency in dual-grating DLAs, showing substantial gains over previous methods.
Findings
Over 100% increase in energy gain with combined schemes.
Achieved up to 2.6 MeV energy gain in simulations.
Effective for structures with 100 to 2000 periods.
Abstract
Dielectric laser-driven accelerators (DLAs) can provide high accelerating gradients in the GV/m range due to their having higher breakdown thresholds than metals, which opens the way for the miniaturization of the next generation of particle accelerator facilities. Two kinds of scheme, the addition of a Bragg reflector and the use of pulse-front-tilted (PFT) laser illumination, have been studied separately to improve the energy efficiency for dual-grating DLAs. The Bragg reflector enhances the accelerating gradient of the structure, while the PFT increases the effective interaction length. In this paper, we investigate numerically the advantages of using the two schemes in conjunction. Our calculations show that, for a 100-period structure with a period of 2 micrometer, such a design effectively increases the energy gain by more than 100 % when compared to employing the Bragg reflector…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
