From a $(p,2)$-Theorem to a Tight $(p,q)$-Theorem
Chaya Keller, Shakhar Smorodinsky

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new method to derive tight $(p,q)$-theorems from $(p,2)$-properties, significantly improving bounds for families with Helly number 2, including axis-parallel rectangles and d-boxes.
Contribution
The authors develop a general bootstrapping technique to convert $(p,2)$-theorems into tight $(p,q)$-theorems for Helly number 2 families, extending results beyond convex sets.
Findings
Proved $HD_{ ext{d-box}}(p,q)=p-q+1$ for $q > c' \log^{d-1} p$.
Established $HD_{ ext{rect}}(p,q)=p-q+1$ for $q ext{ at least } 7 \log_2 p$.
Improved bounds for $(p,2)$-theorems for several classes of set families.
Abstract
A family of sets is said to satisfy the -property if among any sets of some intersect. The celebrated -theorem of Alon and Kleitman asserts that any family of compact convex sets in that satisfies the -property for some , can be pierced by a fixed number of points. The minimum such piercing number is denoted by . Already in 1957, Hadwiger and Debrunner showed that whenever the piercing number is ; no exact values of were found ever since. While for an arbitrary family of compact convex sets in , , a -property does not imply a bounded piercing number, such bounds were proved for numerous specific families. The best-studied among them is axis-parallel rectangles in the plane. Wegner and (independently) Dol'nikov used a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
