X-Cube Fracton Model on Generic Lattices: Phases and Geometric Order

TL;DR

This paper develops a general 3D lattice framework for the X-cube fracton model, revealing how lattice geometry influences phase behavior and proposing a new geometric perspective on fracton order.

Contribution

It introduces a generic lattice construction for fracton models, explores the impact of lattice geometry on phases, and proposes a new definition of phase based on local unitaries and quasi-isometries.

Findings

Lattice curvature can produce a robust ground state degeneracy.

Different lattice geometries without curvature lead to distinct phases.

A new phase equivalence is proposed based on local unitaries and quasi-isometries.

Abstract

Fracton order is a new kind of quantum order characterized by topological excitations that exhibit remarkable mobility restrictions and a robust ground state degeneracy (GSD) which can increase exponentially with system size. In this paper, we present a generic lattice construction (in three dimensions) for a generalized X-cube model of fracton order, where the mobility restrictions of the subdimensional particles inherit the geometry of the lattice. This helps explain a previous result that lattice curvature can produce a robust GSD, even on a manifold with trivial topology. We provide explicit examples to show that the (zero temperature) phase of matter is sensitive to the lattice geometry. In one example, the lattice geometry confines the dimension-1 particles to small loops, which allows the fractons to be fully mobile charges, and the resulting phase is equivalent to (3+1)-dimensional toric code. However, the phase is sensitive to more than just lattice curvature; different lattices without curvature (e.g. cubic or stacked kagome lattices) also result in different phases of matter, which are separated by phase transitions. Unintuitively however, according to a previous definition of phase [Chen, Gu, Wen 2010], even just a rotated or rescaled cubic lattice results in different phases of matter, which motivates us to propose a new and coarser definition of phase for gapped ground states and fracton order. The new equivalence relation between ground states is given by the composition of a local unitary transformation and a quasi-isometry (which can rotate and rescale the lattice); equivalently, ground states are in the same phase if they can be adiabatically connected by varying both the Hamiltonian and the positions of the degrees of freedom (via a quasi-isometry). In light of the importance of geometry, we further propose that fracton orders should be regarded as a geometric order.