The Calculus of Democratization and Development
Jacob Ferguson

TL;DR
This study analyzes 33 Sub-Saharan African countries to understand how democratic elections influence development, revealing three archetypes of outcomes and their impact on progress or regression.
Contribution
It provides an empirical analysis of the relationship between democratic elections and development in Sub-Saharan Africa, identifying key archetypes of electoral impact.
Findings
Countries with positive democratic changes show development improvements
Plateau results correlate with stable development outcomes
Continued descent into authoritarianism leads to negative development effects
Abstract
In accordance with "Democracy's Effect on Development: More Questions than Answers", we seek to carry out a study in following the description in the 'Questions for Further Study.' To that end, we studied 33 countries in the Sub-Saharan Africa region, who all went through an election which should signal a "step-up" for their democracy, one in which previously homogenous regimes transfer power to an opposition party that fairly won the election. After doing so, liberal-democracy indicators and democracy indicators were evaluated in the five years prior to and after the election took place, and over that ten-year period, we examine the data for trends. If we see positive or negative trends over this time horizon, we are able to conclude that it was the recent increase in the quality of their democracy which led to it. Having investigated examples of this in depth, there seem to be three…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPolitical Conflict and Governance · International Development and Aid · World Systems and Global Transformations
